« Southern Baptists & Booze: A Lesson from Recent History by Peter Lumpkins | Main | FamilyNet Radio Interview: by Peter Lumpkins »

2009.06.10

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Les Puryear

Excellent article. I, too, look forward to the rest of the series.

I've noticed that some researchers can default to the negative in their write-up of their findings. I guess negative findings are better news than positive findings.

On another topic, congratulations on the book. Before I lay down my hard earned money for a copy, please answer a question. How is your book different from your blog series on the same topic? Your blog series on alcohol was excellent as I mentioned in my blog.

Thanks.

Les

peter

Les,

Thanks for the input. Hall raises some interesting questions which, if nothing else, causes pause about making assessments so quickly based on the first reading of numbers.

As for my book, Les, thank you for your affirmation.

As for the differences between my blog series and the book, while my conclusions are obviously the same, I actually had an execution plan with the book, something I never had with the posts.

My purpose was to a)introduce the reader to the seriousness of the issue at stake; b) survey how we've responded in the past c) expose the weaknesses I believe are evident in popular non-abstinent views toward intoxicating substances d) offer a comprehensive moral construct of biblical abstinence.

I attempted to fulfill the above in various ways. For example I have a chapter on Prohibition and some of the myths surrounding that era. Also, I attempted to do what, to my knowledge, no other author I've read has done with this particular issue: construct a comprehensive moral principle of abstinence which includes but is not limited to drinking.

Also, unlike you, who's asked about the content, those who've assumed they know precisely what's in the book and even publicly objected to it, will surely be surprised to find out that a substantial portion of my critique is directed in friendly-fire. In other words, I critically engage the views of abstinence adherents

Hope this helps, Les.

With that, I am...
Peter

cb scott

Peter,

Is October 12, 2009 a good date for you to come to speak at the Birmingham Baptist Association Pastors' Conference?

cb

Les Puryear

Peter,

Thanks, that does help. I look forward to reading it.

Les

cb scott

Peter,

Thanks for the email. I am happy that you are coming to our Birmingham Pastors' Conference to speak. I would actually like for you to have the opportunity to speak at every Association in Alabama.

I think you should be the Keynote Speaker at the SBC in Louisville. That would be a good and needful thing.

cb

P.S. Thanks for the book. Well done and scholarly research. Glad to see you did not footnote your own blog:-)

selahV

Peter, I just posted a post on some good things God did in Texas with some of the SWBTS students there. It's on my sbcEncounters blog. Don't know how to put a link in so folks would have to click on my name and then click on the SBC Encounters icon. Shameless, huh? I don't usually do this, but the fact that people are being saved seems to put to question the death (casket) of Christianity. selahV

peter

SelahV,

Here’s the link

With that, I am…

Peter

peter

SelahV,

Oopsie daisy.  Here’s the link, though some will undoubtedly like the scoop on David Brumbelow’s blog.

With that, I am…

Peter

peter

CB

You are very welcome and your encouragement is soothing. May our Lord be in it all.

With that, I am...
Peter

p.s. And, yes, you are correct; my blog as my authority on those claims I've now published in a book would seem to me to be a fatal case of the dumbs...

selahV

Peter, thanks for the linkages. Hope folks read that piece on the Mother being saved when Son preached. It's good. (not that the one announcing David Brumbelow's new blog isn't good, too.) selahV

The comments to this entry are closed.