I like Rick Warren. I always have. God used him in marvelous ways to influence masses of people for the gospel. Like others who've questioned at times some of his methodical means of getting the gospel out, I've had my own reservations. Also, there are portions of the purpose-driven life I personally find inadequate. Millions upon millions of believers register their disagreement with me, however. Nor do such differences lessen my respect for him.
My respect and appreciation aside, Warren has unfortunately scorched his skillet full of tasty corn this week by giving a duplicitous message concerning gay rights, gay marriage, and homosexuality in general. Day before yesterday, while on Larry King Live, Warren categorically denied his public support for California's Proposition Eight marriage amendment which sought to add to the state's constitution, a clause which read, "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."
He said, "During the whole Proposition 8 thing, I never once went to a meeting, never once issued a statement, never...never once even gave an endorsement in the two years Prop 8 was going." He furthermore mentioned he only said something in response to an inquiry a church member had about a week before the vote.
Beware the ever-seeing eye of YouTube. It puts one in a terrible position:
So, my brother Rick: are you or are you not supporting marriage exclusively between a man and a woman as biblically sanctioned?
With that, I am...
Peter
I personally have no use for or respect for the dude. This video clip only lessens my respect for him and I didn't think that was possible. He's starting to sound like Wa.... I mean whatshisname.
Posted by: Joe Blackmon | 2009.04.09 at 02:54 PM
One word (not a dictionary word, but should be): evan-jello-icalism (ht: Phil Johnson).
Posted by: Byroniac | 2009.04.09 at 06:23 PM
Oops, that should be evan-jello-calism.
Posted by: Byroniac | 2009.04.09 at 06:26 PM
Joe & Byron,
Sounds like you guys have little appreciation for Saddleback's ministry in general or our brother Warren in particular. I must dissent. Warren, from my view, is not as far from historic evangelicalism as has been charged by many. Nor is his purpose-driven message completely without merit.
All that aside, the issue here is not about any other concern than whether our California brother was gravely inconsistent in his statements on Prop 8. If so, why? If not, how may the two very different statements be reconciled?
Grace today. With that, I am...
Peter
Posted by: peter lumpkins | 2009.04.10 at 07:54 AM
Rick Warren has at least two things going for him. He's intelligent, and he's a great communicator. I can see that clearly. And I do not think even his critics (such as myself) could deny it.
However, my first and lasting impression of him so far has been one who licked his finger and stuck it in the wind to see which direction he'd be facing that day. And I actually believe he is not lying, just that he hasn't fully explained himself. And that if you listen to him long enough, he'll wind up theologically waffling with masterful verbal contortions and convolutions to arrive to genuine harmony between the two statements without really taking a firm position on anything at all.
Hence, evan-jello-calism.
Posted by: Byroniac | 2009.04.10 at 09:04 AM
Peter,
Rick Warren told Larry King and a nationwide audience that he is completely "oblivious" to gay marriage and the Iowa decision (and I guess we can also infer... God's Word). He further said that defending marriage is not on "his agenda". I didn't realize preachers were able to set their own agenda. I thought we were just messengers and that the message was supposed to be God's.
Interestingly, King's question was vanilla... "How did you handle all the controversy that resulted about the President selecting you?" Warren missed a golden opportunity to restate the Lord's view of marriage and His grace during difficult times; choosing instead to attempt a horrendous fence straddling routine.
Posted by: joe white | 2009.04.10 at 09:59 AM
Peter,
You dissent? How dare you dissent from me!! Kidding. You can be wrong if you want to. Bwahahaha!! That too was kidding.
Posted by: Joe Blackmon | 2009.04.11 at 09:19 PM
He said four guys but only held up THREE fingers.
Posted by: John Daly | 2009.04.13 at 06:10 AM
Can't we all just get along?
I like jello by the way. In small doses mind you. Peter, I'm going to go out on a limb, and say I'm with you brother. God bless.
And you keep on dissenting!
Posted by: Donald Hightower | 2009.04.13 at 07:23 PM
Donald,
Thanks. I appreciate the risk, my brother. Unfortunately, given my next post, you may be sorry for the risk :^)
Grace. With that, I am...
Peter
Posted by: peter lumpkins | 2009.04.14 at 06:57 AM