peterlumpkins.com

Al Mohler, Homosexuality, and the "New Liberalism" by Peter Lumpkins

Last week, I raised the question concerning Andy Stanley’s perplexing story about a gay couple in his church. I wrote:

Cool, hip extremism is extremism just the same: 'snake handling vs 'seeing things' by Peter Lumpkins

Below are two videos. Both are nutty. Both are extreme. Both miserably represent the Christian faith. Both display Scripture abuse. Both claim biblical authority. Both reveal perversion. Both have representatives in evangelicalism. There is at least one difference. One is rejected as extreme nuttiness by virtually every sector of the Christian church. The other is accepted by a large portion of evangelicalism--including many Southern Baptists--as hip, cool, and doing a great work for God. Guess who is hip and cool and who are considered nuts  >>>

Danny Akin, Kevin Ezell, and other SBC leaders: Is Mark Driscoll the kind of leadership model Southern Baptists need? by Peter Lumpkins

Only recently, Mark Driscoll's new book on marriage landed him in controversy. Though advocating what can only be described as hedonistic underpinnings for human sexuality, Danny Akin, president of Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, found himself defending yet once again his relationship with the hip Seattle pastor. Akin fully endorsed Driscoll's book but questions arising from the book's contents apparently pressured him into explaining (and qualifying) his curious endorsement of a monograph containing such provocative views like the moral acceptability of a___ s__  >>> 

Rick Warren's bridge to Mecca by Peter Lumpkins

Twenty-five years ago, two mega-churches stood as measuring stick for the church-growth movement. One was an evangelical church, the other a nominal Southern Baptist church. One was located outside Chicago, the other in sunny California. Bill Hybels was pastor of the former and Rick Warren the latter >>>

NAMB employees under new gag rule? by Peter Lumpkins

The history of "gag rules" begins in our country over the issue of slavery. Between 1836 and 1840, a series of congressional resolutions were passed which effectively tabled, without discussion, petitions regarding slavery, a congressional move obviously intended to shut down the voice of the abolitionists. More recently, the term gag rule has been applied to presidential regulations banning abortion counseling by employees of family planning clinics that received a particular type of federal funding (//link).  In most cases, the term gag rule seems to indicate an authoritative prohibition of expression effectively producing a non-negotiable order of silence  >>>

UPDATE: Please note Mike Ebert's contribution in the comment thread and my response. I'll swiftly and properly deal with this when I have more information. 

Send North America: Who’s coming to St. Louis? NAMB or Acts 29? by Mary England

As a life-long St. Louisan I read with interest the recent Baptist Press article about NAMB's plan to plant 75 new churches in the St. Louis Metro Area. My initial thoughts were; where are they going to plant new churches, what about the struggling existing churches, and what kind of new churches?  >>>

SBC Tomorrow welcomes back Mary England as Guest Contributor*

When Calvinists and their Calvinism becomes destructive to local churches by Peter Lumpkins

I'm often intrigued when the question is raised concerning the destructive results untold churches have experienced when Calvinism is both introduced and imposed upon a local congregation--a congregation whose theological heritage is not Calvinism or Reformed  >>>