« President Trump's promise to nominate a Supreme Court justice similar to Antonin Scalia | Main

Jun 16, 2017


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


iIt was way too vague. I suspected alt right was to mean anyone who voted for Trump but with plausible deniability that if one says that, it means they feel guilty. (That has been the favorite tactic coming out of the Neo Cal movement) They are not exactly known for their upfront honesty and lack of deception.

It was most certainly imbalanced on purpose considering the trajectory of violence all over the country from the left. That is too obvious to deny. It was most definitely the new political agendas from the Moore wing. I always find it strange they don't denounce Patriarchy while they are at it.

My first thought paralleled my reading of Mao's Cultural Revolution tactics. I see it all the time in politics but Baptists? One of the tactics was that the literates had to repent/confess/etc of being literate because it made the illiterates feel bad about themselves. Many literates were not even that literate but to be accepted they had to admit they were bad. Supposedly, that equalized everything. We all know how that worked out.

So, we have a situation where to be accepted one has to vote against something they don't believe they are guilty of or that automatically means they are guilty. Welcome to the SBC, comrades. Sort of reminds me of the Lutheran church of Germany in the early 30's.

My ultra radar senses suspect this was all to vindicate poor beleaguered Russ Moore. I can imagine the media optics he has lined up.

Kyle B. Gulledge

Amen, Peter! As usual you are dead on.
I was telling someone in Phoenix this past week, that " One of the most brilliant bloggers we have is Peter Lumpkins. The problem is, Peter doesn't blog as frequently as I wish."
I hope this is a restart of you getting back into it!


Btw, Shouldn't the Neo Cals root out the "Alt Right" in their churches and 9 Marks "church discipline" them? I will be watching for that.

Hope it's not a big donor. :)

pam knight

We always try to read everything you post and as usual you have once again hit the nail right on the head. Thanks for speaking out for all of us who can't write and depend on a "Like" & "Share" button :-)


For eight years we were told that President Obama was the smartest man ever to hold the Presidency, that he was the best at everything he did - speaking, writing, oration etc. The fact was that he simply repeated the same tripe over and over and his oration skills failed without the use of the teleprompter (reading off a teleprompter is an actual skill which our current president does nor possess and Obama did) but contrary to all the hype when you study Obama and all his speeches and spoken words there simply wasn't a whole lot of depth - no sign that he was very deeply read and as I stated just simply a lot of repetition in his speech. But no one could say that Barack Obama while certainly an intelligent man was not the absolute most bestest, smartest, brilliantist, articulatist, man ever in the history of mankind because RACIST! that's why.

So now in the SBC you have a man who has been petted and fawned over and told how great he is and oh thank you, thank you so much for blessing us with your wisdom oh great one. The truth is this man is not nearly as smart or wise as those groveling want everyone to believe. The truth is this man does not have a gift for writing. The truth is this man is actually a very divisive hateful man who seems to enjoy making all the white boys jump through his hoops declaring how they are so not racist because they love him and have learned so much from him. You can't learn a thing about racism from the race hustlers. You will never jump through enough hoops and never apologize enough to appease this type of man. Never ever ever. If you think you're learning about racism from this type of person than you need to get out more.

Some people in the SBC are starting to recognize the hustle for what it is. Not because they're racist but because they realize it's fruitless to engage these types of people on anything because everything is racism without end.

And for the record the actual racists are the people who grovel to a black man by refusing to tell him the truth which is no you really are not gifted at writing and your motion was an inflammatory, poorly written mess. That's racism when you won't offer even constructive criticism to a black man because he's black.


A few things for those interested

This is a facebook post from a Vaderbilt PolySci/Law Professor who also happens to be an AA woman. Maybe she knows a thing or two about racism.


The SBC has apologized for slavery two or three times. How many black Baptists have accepted the SBC’s apologies? In the current controversy, SBC leaders who accepted the politically-inspired resolution became the peacemakers. There is nothing righteous or holy about extortion. Black pastors should leave their partisan politics at home. It would be far more important for them to focus on teaching their congregants about how to live biblical lifestyles. Phoenix was about politics. Jesus and the Gospel had nothing to do with the extortion and demand for the organization to denounce white supremacy. Black supremacy and extortion was what was on display. The SBC leaders who accepted the political resolution become the peacemakers. I am glad these leaders modeled godly behavior by turning the other cheek.. Those who fanned the flames of discord and those who acted as enablers should be ashamed of themselves. What happened at the convention was wrong, evil, and mean-spirited, It was designed to feed the media’s taste for drama. It hurt Christians and it created more ill-feelings in the nation. #SBC #Baptistconvention

Infogalatic is supposed to be the right's alternative to Wikepedia. I've given the link to it's definition of the Alt right but it might be a source to check against wikepedia when you want a more rightward thought.


And Vox Day who has a real name you can google. He is an Alt-right leader. But understand the "alt-right" isn't as identifiable as some would have you believe. Yes there are white supremacists who identify as alt=right but it's not actually all about racism for a lot of the movement.



"We peed on Liberals and Moderates."

True. As a Moderate I say "Thanks for acknowledging it."

And welcome back!


"Some people in the SBC are starting to recognize the hustle for what it is. Not because they're racist but because they realize it's fruitless to engage these types of people on anything because everything is racism without end."

It IS fruitless. The left? It's like talking to middle schoolers. But their biggest problems start when people don't even want discourse with these mantra spouting censoring/insulting types anymore. They vote with their wallets and feet.


This resolution was about more than racism and the alt right. It's about tarring the entire Republican party with racism. Racist vote R. The Alt Right votes R. White Supremacists vote R. Why do all these evil people vote R? Must be because Republicans are racist as a party. Notice there is never any defense of conservative economic ideology when anyone makes statements that D's are better for AA community with regards to the safety net etc. It's just a given that R's must hate poor people and only care about rich people and the only reason any Christian can have to vote R is abortion and gay marriage. You can't have a discussion that Democrat policies have failed, are failing and will continue to fail because you're a racist if you try to point out facts. Only feelings actually matter and only the feelings of certain people. There is a movement in the SBC to shame people into voting D because only D's care about poor people, old people, children, police hunting black men, saving the planet from global warming and whatever the cause de jour. Republicans are "killing" people with their policies so what's the big deal with abortion?

The alt right is simply a new boogie man because calling everybody racist has stopped working. Used to be you could accuse someone of racism and shut down a discussion. Now you call people racist and they're more likely to say "yeah everybody is let's get back on track here."

One thing this resolution has done is to make pretty much all future resolutions on racism meaningless. Any future committee who gets a racism resolution will send it out to vote and the messengers will dutifully cast an annual "Yes, the SBC is not racist" vote. And the world just laughs because they look at it as "thou doest protest too much!"

Jesse Lott

Looking in from the outside you have a more accurate view than many who were right there in the building. You are spot on! A resolution condemning BLM would have been more appropriate. This one man's agenda, and he was was determined to get his resolution. And he got it, and the SBC is not the better for it.

peter lumpkins

Thanks for the feed back y'all. Check out Joe Carter's explanation of "alt-right" --http://erlc.com/resource-library/articles/what-christians-should-know-about-the-alt-right

Here's the WP piece upon which Carter depended. Are we supposed to just take Carter at his word? Does ERLC not believe in research and offering reputable sources so the reader may dig deeper?


The ERLC defines for you. No independent critical thinking allowed to be in the club.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)